Sign inGet started

Compare company tech stack tools

Find internal SaaS that public signals miss, then prioritize companies with estimated subscription spend. Explore the evidence by service category and compare anvendor with individual tools.

anvendor10 COMPANIES · 714 anvendor FINDINGS

See the SaaS
public signals miss.

48%

344 of 714 findings had no trace in the public methods we checked. The gap is largest in learning and HR services.

Only in anvendorAlso in job signals onlyAlso in bothAlso in web / DNS only
Brackets include the shared purple segment:Job signalsWeb / DNS

  • Learning & training

    49 of 58 findings

  • HR & workplace

    34 of 54 findings

  • AI tools

    23 of 43 findings

  • Security & IT

    48 of 93 findings

  • Website & ad tech

    17 of 34 findings

  • Engineering & dev tools

    23 of 47 findings

  • Sales, marketing & customer service

    42 of 88 findings

  • Finance, legal & procurement

    20 of 52 findings

  • Productivity & collaboration

    53 of 155 findings

  • Design & media

    14 of 43 findings

  • Cloud & data infrastructure

    7 of 32 findings

Shares of anvendor findings, not accuracy scores. Public signals: Wappalyzer, DNS, Bloomberry, TheirStack, Sumble Tech Stack tabs and reviewed job posts; BuiltWith at Stripe only. “Only in anvendor” means absent from those collected results, not invisible everywhere or verified paid use. The total includes 15 “Other” findings (14 without a public trace), omitted from the category rows. Research by anvendor · anvendor.com/vs

Download the infographic (PNG)

anvendorGITHUB · ESTIMATED ANNUAL SPEND · USD

Put a price range
next to the prospect.

anvendor estimates GitHub spend at named companies. Vendr's purchase benchmark adds market context to those account-level ranges.

VENDR MARKET MEDIAN

$54,354 / yr

Across 984 GitHub purchases

VENDR PUBLISHED LOW–HIGH

$14,283–$159,324

Market-wide annual contract values

Usage-based estimateSize-based estimateVendr low–highVendr median

NVIDIA

$123k–$246k

Salesforce

$120k–$239k

Broadcom

$105k–$209k

AMD

$85.9k–$172k

Saab

$78.1k–$156k

Nestlé

$66.2k–$132k

ShopifyEst. adoption 52%

$59.9k–$99.8k

StripeEst. adoption 36%

$50.4k–$101k

Mercedes-Benz

$43.1k–$86.2k

Arm

$44.8k–$74.6k

PayPal

$39.1k–$78.1k

Palo Alto Networks

$38.9k–$77.9k

State Farm

$34k–$68k

Akamai

$37.6k–$62.7k

The Home Depot

$30.4k–$60.7k

Databricks

$27.8k–$46.4k

Spotify

$25.7k–$42.8k

OpenAI

$19.4k–$32.3k

Dropbox

$9.5k–$13.6k

Figma

$7.1k–$10.1k

Source: the saved Vendr GitHub benchmark and 20 selected anvendor company estimates. anvendor uses published plans and estimated usage or company size. Fourteen whole ranges sit inside Vendr's interval; these are different populations, not a contract-level accuracy test. Neither a market benchmark nor an estimate establishes a named company's invoice. Research by anvendor · anvendor.com/vs

Download the infographic (PNG)

Methodology, tested services & customer references

Companies checked: Atlassian (atlassian.com), Canva (canva.com), Shopify (shopify.com), Okta (okta.com), HubSpot (hubspot.com), Databricks (databricks.com), OpenAI (openai.com), Ramp (ramp.com), Stripe (stripe.com) and Airbnb (airbnb.com). We selected well-known technology companies often named in customer references, with roughly fewer than 15,000 staff and matching website and corporate domains. This is a selected sample, not a representative market survey.

The starting point: vendors’ own customer logos and case studies. A company logo, customer story or testimonial published by a service vendor supplied a reference pair: for example, Stripe named by BrowserStack becomes stripe.com × BrowserStack. We then checked whether each collected tool result named that vendor or a matching product.

The reference set contains 316 relationships from 207 vendors: 175 involving vendors in anvendor's catalogue, reviewed individually, plus 141 involving additional vendors. For the additional group, a named product belonging to the vendor counted. Three SendGrid references duplicated Twilio relationships and were excluded.

What the percentages mean. On competitor pages, found ÷ published reference pairs is positive-reference recall. There are no verified negatives, so this does not measure precision. References may be old, describe one team or favour prominent companies. The catalogue subset favours anvendor's coverage; the added vendors came from collected tool lists, so vendors no method reported are omitted. We build anvendor and did not independently verify paid contracts. Missing evidence does not establish non-use.

A separate category analysis: the visibility infographic starts with 714 anvendor findings across 266 distinct services at those ten companies, rather than the 316 published reference pairs. Each finding is classified by service category and checked for traces in website/DNS/infrastructure results, job signals, both or neither. Its percentages are shares of anvendor findings, not retrieval accuracy. BuiltWith covers Stripe only, Sumble its Tech Stack tabs; the collected surfaces do not represent every competitor's full product.

Pricing: 20 selected GitHub estimates use published plans and estimated usage or company size. Vendr's saved GitHub benchmark covers 984 purchases from a different population. The interval overlap provides context; no named company's invoice was checked. Results were saved at different times, rather than collected simultaneously.

Download all 316 reference pairs and source links (CSV)

All 207 tested reference vendors

Each name links to a vendor-published reference page. The CSV maps every company-service pair to its source; this list describes the reference set, not anvendor's entire catalogue or all technologies returned by competitors.

Start with a service and explore companies using it.

Browse companies by service